skip the i-GuideIllinois State UniversityAdmissions at ISUAcademics at ISUEvents at ISUMap of ISUISU A to Z ListingISU AccessibilityISU 150th Anniversary
SEAT Center
 
 
 
Back to Table of Contents
Next Question

Day of Visioning: Increasing Access to Assistive Technology

Question 1: What do you see as the state of AT services nationally?

A key finding that emerged from the discussions is that ‘local development’ is driven by ‘local need’ with regard to both delivery systems and populations served. Within local communities there is an array of successful ‘local solutions’ to the full range of service needs, that may include (a) pre-service education and professional development; (b) distribution networks; (c) product development an distribution; and (d) ‘individual’ research-based strategies (i.e., small scale studies focusing on specific issues/problems).

Discussants noted that awareness level information and professional development is not evenly distributed across constituencies around the country. Additionally, AT knowledge of and means for determining efficacy and outcomes are not sufficiently developed nor widely available. More specifically, it was suggested that a ’funneling’ effect operates within service systems (e.g., AT experts at the national level funnel information in workshops to state leaders; state leaders funnel information to constituencies in communities; AT experts in schools funnel information to teachers and families).

Another concern that emerged in discussions focused on funding ‘priorities’ and cost ‘misinformation’ that tend to prohibit informed assessment. It was suggested that this is driving ‘upscaling’ (e.g., designing and distributing complex AT to meet needs of many individuals, resulting in lack of acceptance by professionals due to complexity).

Links:

Participant

Topic (Video Links)

Phil Parette

 

 

Distributed systems

Need for professional leadership training

IDEA and mild disabilities

Ted Hasselbring

 

 

 

Fear/cost factors, and vendor training roles

Special education has many mixed markets

Training is being provided in areas where there is no educational market

Kentucky’s use of AT for statewide testing

Caroline Van Howe

 

 

Vendor responsibilities and expectations for training

Vendor concerns about efficacy data

Difficulties in sharing AT expertise nationally

Cheryl Volkman

 

 

AT has been a separate and often ineffective part of planning, as well as upscaling effect

Need for and inefficiencies in existing training approaches

Marcia Scherer

 

Complexity of devices having UDL design

Time constraints in conducing good AT assessments

Cathy Bodine

 

Current inefficiency of distribution systems

Need for AT baseline knowledge level

Paul Dulle

 

Infinitec approach to building school AT coalitions

Distributed system sustainability

Dianne Ashby

Importance of technology being part of educational experiences for all children

Jim Thompson

Need for general problem-solving skill sets among teachers

Gil Barner

 

 

 

AT field is a cottage industry without mass and inefficiency of distribution

Need cohesive plan to take AT to the world

Strategies for developing AT plan

Needs for moderator/expertise in developing AT plan

Ruth Ziolkowski

 

 

 

 

Need for broad awareness of AT with less dependence on ‘experts’

AT niche markets

Sustainability issue and need to get AT to students

Need to examine successful systems and identify best practices in classrooms

Need for AT model to teach people basic AT skills